বিষয়বস্তুতে চলুন

ব্যবহারকারী:খাত্তাব হাসান/খেলাঘর

উইকিউক্তি, মুক্ত উক্তি-উদ্ধৃতির সংকলন থেকে
উইকিউক্তি নীতিমালা ও নির্দেশিকা
বিষয়বস্তু
আচরণ
কার্যক্রম
সংক্ষিপ্ত

উইকিউক্তি প্রধান নামস্থানে তৈরি করা সমস্ত পাঠ্য নিবন্ধগুলির মানদণ্ড (উইকিউক্তি কী নয়), উদ্ধৃতি সংকলন গুণমান (সঠিকতা, উৎসকরণ এবং যাচাইযোগ্যতা), সম্পাদকীয় পদ্ধতি (নিরপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিকোণ) এবং সেইসাথে বিভিন্ন গুরুত্বপূর্ণ নিয়মের সাপেক্ষে। উইকিউক্তি কপিরাইট নীতি। যে প্রবন্ধ এবং পাঠ্যগুলি এইগুলি পূরণ করতে সক্ষম সেগুলি সাধারণত সম্পাদনার মাধ্যমে প্রতিকার করা উচিত, তবে যে বিষয়বস্তু উইকিউক্তির জন্য অন্তর্ভুক্তির মানদণ্ডে ব্যর্থ হয়, স্বনামধন্য উত্সগুলির সাথে যাচাই করতে অক্ষম, বা কপিরাইট নীতি লঙ্ঘন করে, সাধারণত মুছে ফেলা হয়।

একটি উইকিউক্তি নিবন্ধ মুছে ফেলার ফলে বর্তমান সংস্করণ এবং পূর্ববর্তী সমস্ত সংস্করণ দৃশ্য থেকে মুছে যায়। পৃষ্ঠা ফাঁকা করার বিপরীতে, যেটি যেকোন ব্যবহারকারী দ্বারা সঞ্চালিত (বা প্রত্যাবর্তন) করা যেতে পারে, কেবলমাত্র প্রশাসকদের দ্বারা মুছে ফেলা সম্ভব। উইকিউক্তির স্বাভাবিক ক্রিয়াকলাপে, প্রতি মাসে ১০ থেকে ২০টি পাতা মুছে ফেলা হয়, একটি মুছে ফেলার প্রক্রিয়া অনুসারে যা সমস্ত ব্যবহারকারীর জন্য উন্মুক্ত।

এই পৃষ্ঠাটি বর্ণনা করে যে কীভাবে মুছে ফেলার জন্য উপযুক্ত বলে মনে করা পৃষ্ঠাগুলি পরিচালনা করা উচিত, বিভিন্ন মুছে ফেলার বিকল্প এবং প্রক্রিয়াগুলি ব্যাখ্যা করে এবং উইকিউক্তি নিবন্ধগুলির সাথে কিছু সাধারণ সমস্যাগুলির সংক্ষিপ্তসার করে যা মুছে ফেলার পাশাপাশি অপসারণের বিকল্পগুলির জন্যও বলা যেতে পারে।

অপসারণপদ্ধতি

[সম্পাদনা]

যদি একটি পাতা উইকিউক্তি:দ্রুত অপসারণের নীতিমালার অধীনে তালিকাভুক্ত বিষয়শ্রেণীর মধ্যে না পড়ে, তাহলে উইকিউক্তি:অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনায় কমপক্ষে সাত দিন অতিবাহিত না করা পর্যন্ত এটি অপসারণ করা যাবে না।

সমস্যাযুক্ত পাতা/চিত্র/বিষয়শ্রেণী নিয়ে কি করবেন

[সম্পাদনা]

Does the page really belong on VfD? Read the following two tables to find out what to do with a problem page.

যে সমস্যাগুলির জন্য মুছে ফেলার প্রয়োজন নেই
পাতার সমস্যা সমাধান এই ট্যাগটি যোগ করুন
বিদেশী ভাষায় লেখা নিবন্ধ।
 List in Category:Pages needing translation. {{বাংলা নয়}}
একটি অসম্পূর্ণ (তবে সম্ভাবনা রয়েছে)।
 List in Category:Wikiquote stubs, or, better yet, expand it! {{stub}}
Such a tiny domain of quotes that it doesn't deserve its own article.
 Merge the useful content into a more comprehensive article and redirect. {{merge}}
Article duplicates substantial information in some other article.
 Merge with other article and redirect. {{merge}} [[article]].
Article needs improvement.
 List in Category:Wikiquote cleanup. {{cleanup}}
Article needs a lot of improvement. List on Wikiquote:Pages needing attention.  
Article is biased or has lots of POV.
 List on Wikiquote:Pages needing attention. {{npov}} or {{POV check}}
Dispute over article content.
 List on Wikiquote:Requests for comments. {{disputed}}
Two subjects have the same name.
 Make a disambiguation page. {{disambig}}
Can't verify information in article.
 Follow the procedure on Wikipedia:Verifiability; if that doesn't work, come back here. If quotes are truly unverifiable, they may be deleted.  
Inappropriate user page. Talk to the user; if that doesn't work, come back here.  
Vandalism or inaccuracy.
 Revert it and mention it on Wikiquote:Vandalism in progress.  
Annoying user. Add user to Wikiquote:Requests for comments. But stay cool.  
Problems that may require deletion
Problem with page Solution Add this tag
List on Wikiquote:Votes for deletion. {{vfd-new}}
Article or image is possible copyright infringement.
 List on Wikiquote:Votes for deletion, mentioning alleged source of copyright. {{vfd-new}}
Redundant, useless, or problematic template or series box.
 List on Wikiquote:Votes for deletion. Be sure to describe specific problem. {{Vfd-template-new}}
  • Otherwise undesirable image.
  • Useless redirect (not common; redirects are cheap).
  • Category scheme gone awry.
 List on Wikiquote:Votes for deletion. Be sure to describe specific problem. {{vfd-new}}
Page belongs in:
  • Wikipedia (article),
  • Wikisource (full speech or other entire work),
  • Wiktionary (dictionary definition).
 List on Wikiquote:Transwiki candidates under the appropriate section. {{move to Wikipedia}}


{{move to Wikisource}}

{{move to Wiktionary}}

Article is a candidate for speedy deletion including:

(Complete list is at Speedy deletion: the cases.)

Add to Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. {{delete}} or

{{db|reason}}

See also: Wikiquote:Template messages#Deletion

If you feel the page under consideration meets the above guidelines for listing at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion, you can nominate it there by following the instructions at the top of WQ:VFD. Be sure to give the reason why you think it should be deleted. It will remain there for a time, giving other users the chance to comment on whether they think deletion is in fact appropriate. After an appropriate lag time, an administrator will delete the page if a rough consensus is reached (see guidelines of deletion rough consensus).

For candidates for speedy deletion, administrators do not have to request deletion — they may delete them on sight.

"Listed for deletion" notice

[সম্পাদনা]

When you list a page on Wikiquote:Votes for deletion, it is necessary to let its readers know it might be deleted, regardless of whether it is a brand-new page or an old one with a long history. The way to do this is to place a {{vfd-new}} tag above the page's content, which expands to:

টেমপ্লেট:Vfd-new

This notice is intended to encourage readers to join in the deletion discussion, and to give readers and new users a chance to understand why a page may be removed. If a redirect is nominated for deletion, it should also include the tag at the top. This will break the redirection, but is the only practical means to notify users of the redirect that it is under discussion for deletion.

If you are nominating a template for deletion, please add {{vfd-template-new|template name|discussion name}} to the top of the template. This will provide a tiny, discreet alert on the pages using this template, identifying the template under deletion consideration and providing a link to its discussion. (See Template:vfd-template-new for important usage details.)

Lag times

[সম্পাদনা]

Once a page is listed for deletion, the nomination is kept open for a period of time to allow for community comment. The different deletion nomination methods have different "lag times" (the length of time that the page should normally be listed before the article can be deleted). This gives other users the chance to comment on whether they think deletion is in fact appropriate. The lag times are currently set at:

Commenting on a listing for deletion

[সম্পাদনা]

When someone has listed an article for deletion on one of the lists, anyone else may comment on the request. When expressing an opinion, please include your opinion and your reasoning, and sign with ~~~~ (four consecutive tilde characters). The following are some suggested wordings. There is a list of these and other commonly used shorthands at Wikipedia:Guide to deletion.

The bolding of action votes (by placing three apostrophes (''') on each side) makes it easier for admins to count and review the votes at decision time. However, except for the signature, these are guidelines, not requirements. Note to adminstrators: "merge into [[article]] and redirect" requires that the information on authorship of the content is somehow preserved, unless it is solely public domain text.

Decision policy

[সম্পাদনা]

For pages listed on Wikiquote:Votes for deletion, if a rough consensus has been reached by the end of the lag time to delete the page, the page will be removed. Otherwise the page remains. Note that what a rough consensus is is not set in stone. Some consider a 2/3 majority a "rough consensus", while others believe consensus implies a higher ratio. Administrators must use their best judgment to discern a consensus. Consensus is not merely a vote, as administrators have no way to guarantee one-person, one-vote participation, and all pages within Wikiquote must abide by the consensuses of established Wikiquote policy and Wikimedia Foundation rules and guidelines as well as the current opinions given in each discussion. Administrators are also encouraged to consider the involvement of the discussion participants in general Wikiquote work to avoid "ballot stuffing" by groups of one-time users only interested in single articles. (See w:Wikipedia:Voting is evil and w:WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a Democracy for more discussion on why strict voting is impractical for Wikimedia projects.)

Pages that have been improved along the lines of the discussion and general Wikiquote practices may also remain if the improvement has been sufficient to make the rationale for the original deletion nomination no longer relevant. This requires a reason to be given initially when requesting that a page be deleted.

Please do not remove any votes from any VfD or like discussion. If you suspect that a vote comes from a sockpuppet or is otherwise invalid, mark it as such with a comment, list any pertinent links, and leave it there. Admins reviewing the discussion will investigate and decide whether or not to take that vote into account, and may strike multiple votes by a single user, or "forged" votes (signed as someone other than the user shown in the edit history). But by not removing any votes, we ensure that there can be no arguments over who removed what and why.

Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators expands on this and provides a little rationale.

Finishing a vote for deletion

[সম্পাদনা]

There are five basic steps to completing a VfD discussion:

  1. Determine consensus and close the vote.
  2. Take any required action on the named article(s).
  3. Create an archive copy from the closed discussion with the page name Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/DISCUSSION TITLE.
  4. Move the VfD entry to the appropriate month page in Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Log.
  5. Remove the discussion from Wikiquote:Votes for deletion.

At any point after the end of the lag time or announced vote closure time (ideally within a day), an administrator will determine whether there is a consensus. No consensus is, by default, a community decision to keep. The admin's finding should be clearly recorded in the VfD entry so the community will know the result without reading the entire discussion (which may be quite long). If a vote closes line was provided in the VfD discussion, it should be changed to vote closed and show the result. Note that unlike Wikipedia, only an administrator may close a VfD.

As soon as possible after closing, an admin will take the specified action on the article.

  • If the vote was to keep, the {{vfd-new}} tag should be removed from the article, and notice posted on the article's talk page about the concluded VfD that includes a link to the archived VfD discussion. This is also done for any action, like merge and redirect, that results in something being left at that article's title space. The template {{vfd-kept-new|DISCUSSION TITLE}} can be used as a notice for articles kept intact. {{vfd-redirect|DISCUSSION TITLE|NEW PAGE TITLE}} can be used for articles that were redirected to another title, as well as merged articles, since the merge-from page is then made a redirect.
  • If the consensus was to delete, the article and its talk page will be deleted. It is a good idea to prefix the deletion log summary with VFD: to indicate the deletion was a result of a community vote. (Speedy deletions are typically prefixed with SD: reason.)
  • If the result was to delete, but the deletion cannot be carried out for an extended period of time, the entry should be listed in the Pending deletion page of the deletion log. (This typically includes pages with considerable content that must be distributed to other pages or otherwise conserved elsewhere before final deletion.)

After recording the result, the admin should quickly copy the VfD discussion into a new page, Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/DISCUSSION TITLE, where "DISCUSSION TITLE" is the VfD discussion title, usually but not always the page name. (The page Wikiquote:Useful links has a convenient input box that makes this creation easier.) This makes the discussion and decision available for review. Next, the archived VfD discussion should be listed in the appropriate month page (e.g., Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Log/2006 September) in the reverse order that they were nominated, so that the latest nominations are at the top. This is accomplished by adding the following text above the existing entries:

{{Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/DISCUSSION TITLE}}

The resulting transclusion automatically displays the content of the archived discussion as if it were part of the month log page.

Closing and archiving admins should include edit summaries for their actions that make it easier to spot the actions in the VfD edit history, like closed PAGE vote; result: delete (for closure) and archived: PAGE (for archiving).

Wikipedia has more information on the general process (some of which is followed here) at Wikipedia:Deletion process.

Undeletion

[সম্পাদনা]

Deleted pages can be restored, by administrators, if and only if there is support on Wikiquote:Deletion review, or the page was speedily deleted out-of-process. If deletions are made too casually, Wikiquote may lose potentially useful text, and members of the community may feel that their work is not appreciated. Hence, the decision to permanently delete an article is not taken lightly, and the deletion process is followed. See Wikiquote:Undeletion policy for guidance on undeletion.

If an article is repeatedly re-created by unassociated editors after being deleted, this should be seen as evidence for the need for an article. Administrators should always be responsible with the power that they have. If in doubt... don't delete!

See also

[সম্পাদনা]
'https://bn.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=ব্যবহারকারী:খাত্তাব_হাসান/খেলাঘর&oldid=49116' থেকে আনীত